If the java committee had 1/10 of the his creativity we would not be in situation that Java had generics 2 years after .net and made much worse. Type erasure, give me a break. And what's new in syntax after 1.5? @Override for interfaces? Call me when they have lambdas. Or should I be fair and ask a feature .Net has at least for 8 years, like properties? Oh those boolean isCanRead() getters are so elegant. The situation in Java language development is awful.
Comments
Beautiful , 2 thumbs up
חחח גדול
Thumbs up for the director of the movie.
If the java committee had 1/10 of the his creativity we would not be in situation that Java had generics 2 years after .net and made much worse. Type erasure, give me a break. And what's new in syntax after 1.5? @Override for interfaces? Call me when they have lambdas. Or should I be fair and ask a feature .Net has at least for 8 years, like properties? Oh those boolean isCanRead() getters are so elegant. The situation in Java language development is awful.
Andrew,
with all you have said , java's still much better and even without generics at all it's superior!